By newsfirstusa 
In a unused documentary delving into the future and legacy of Martha Stewart, the homemaking grasp takes a swing at former FBI Director James Comey.
Her feedback come all through a division of the movie that makes a speciality of her federal obstruction of justice trial and five-month stint in jail starting in 2004 — 5 years nearest Stewart, 83, turned into the primary self-made feminine billionaire in 1999.
“It was so horrifying to me that I had to go through that to be a trophy for these idiots in the U.S. Attorney’s office,” she says within the Netflix documentary known as “Martha,” which was once excused on Oct. 30.
Comey, who was once in the back of the now-defunct 2016 Russia investigation into Donald Trump that the previous president dubbed a “witch hunt,” was once the supremacy prosecutor who indicted Stewart on fees of obstruction of justice and mendacity to the FBI in 2003. The costs got here in reference to the FBI’s insider buying and selling investigation into her pal’s corporate, ImClone.
Martha Stewart in “Martha.” (Courtesy of Netflix © 2024)
“I was a trophy — a prominent woman, the first billionaire woman in America,” Stewart says of the case in “Martha.”
“Those prosecutors should have been put in a Cuisinart and turned on high.”
When fees had been to start with filed towards Stewart, after 62, then-U.S. Attorney Comey mentioned all through a 2003 information convention that the “case is about lying — lying to the FBI, lying to the SEC and investors.”
Martha Stewart in “Martha.” ( 2024 Martha Stewart/Courtesy of Netflix)
“That is conduct that will not be tolerated. Martha Stewart is being prosecuted not because of who she is, but what she did,” he said at the time.
In the meantime, Stewart’s lawyer, the past due Robert Morvillo, puzzled whether or not the costs had been filed “for publicity purposes or because Martha is a celebrity” in a commentary nearest the indictment was once filed.
Martha Stewart was once sentenced to 5 months in jail for mendacity to investigators a few reserve sale that introduced her somewhat tiny monetary acquire however value her popularity closely. (Brian ZAK/Gamma-Rapho by way of Getty Photographs)
“Is it because she is a woman who has successfully competed in a man’s business world by virtue of her talent, hard work and demanding standards?” Morvillo requested. Stewart had made her fortune off her media corporate, Martha Stewart Residing Omnimedia Inc., which she based in 1997.
“I always personally thought they were making an example of her because of her celebrity.”
Craig Greening, managing spouse of Greening Regulation Staff and a legal protection lawyer, instructed Fox Information Virtual that the “Southern District of New York is notorious for prosecuting high-profile individuals and leveraging their cases to send a broader message.”
Waksal admitted he have shyed away from paying $1.2 million in taxes on 9 artwork he bought. (Adam Rountree/Getty Photographs)
“Martha Stewart’s case fits this pattern,” Greening mentioned. “The prosecution’s pivot to obstruction of justice when insider trading charges couldn’t stick highlights a strategy often used to hold public figures accountable in highly visible ways.”
Greening added that the costs filed towards Stewart “were valid given the evidence.”
JAMES COMEY SLAMS BIDEN DOJ FOR MOVING TOO SLOWLY ON TRUMP INVESTIGATION: ‘WE’RE STUCK’
“However, the question of proportionality remains. Stewart served five months in prison and five months under home confinement—not insignificant penalties for a 1001 violation,” he defined. “One could argue that her punishment felt more about creating an example than ensuring justice, which fuels the debate over fairness in her case.”
Greening mentioned it’s a usual tactic for the federal government to “shift to obstruction-of-justice” fees when “the primary charge is difficult to prove.”
“In Stewart’s case, this approach allowed the prosecution to maintain accountability, but it also underscores the role of discretion in targeting public figures,” Greening mentioned.
BIDEN OFFICIAL CLAIMS SPECIAL COUNSEL REPORT WAS ‘COMEY MOMENT’
In an Oct. 31 interview with The New York Times, following the respectable premiere of “Martha” on Netflix, the media multi-millionaire mentioned she loved the primary part of the movie however described the second one part of as “a bit lazy.” Her trial, she mentioned, was once “not that important.”
FBI Director James Comey testifies ahead of a Space Oversight and Executive Reform Committee at the “Oversight of the State Department” in Washington on July 7, 2016. (Reuters/Gary Cameron)
“The trial and the actual incarceration was less than two years out of an 83-year life,” Stewart instructed the Instances. “I considered it a vacation, to tell you the truth.”
Greening believes Stewart’s “anger is understandable.”
“Stewart felt she was unfairly targeted as a ‘trophy’ for prosecutors, and her claims align with broader critiques of selective prosecution,” he mentioned. “Being a self-made billionaire and a woman in power likely magnified the scrutiny she faced. The severity of her punishment also supports her frustration—this case was about making a statement as much as it was about justice.”
Martha Steward in “Martha.” (Courtesy of Netflix © 2024)
“Martha” Director R.J. Cutler described Stewart in a commentary previous to the movie’s let fall as “a personification of her times and such an American success story.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“It was clear to me that she was thinking about telling her life story in some form, and it wasn’t hard to imagine that there was a life-and-times movie to be made that explored why Martha has been such a significant cultural and business figure for so many decades in so many ways,” Cutler instructed Netflix. “I started reading about Martha and the more I did, the more it became clear to me that she was a complex person filled with so many conflicts and contradictions.”
He went on to explain Stewart as a “visionary” who “understood the lack of barriers between different kinds of content before others did; she understood the power of the personal brand before others did.”