Stanford College coach Jeff Hancock accused of the use of AI to quote faux learn about


A Stanford University “misinformation expert” has been accused of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to craft testimony upcoming worn via Minnesota Legal professional Common Keith Ellison in a politically-charged case.

Jeff Hancock, a coach of communications and founding father of the vaunted faculty’s Social Media Lab, equipped a professional declaration in a case involving a satirical conservative YouTuber named Christopher Kohls. The court docket case is set Minnesota’s fresh cancel on political deepfakes, which the plaintiffs argue is an assault on independent pronunciation.

Hancock’s testimony used to be submitted to the court docket via Ellison, who’s arguing in partial of the legislation. Hancock is “well-known for his research on how people use deception with technology, from sending texts and emails to detecting fake online reviews,” in line with Stanford’s web page.

However the plaintiff’s attorneys have requested the Minnesota federal pass judgement on listening to the case to brush aside the testimony, charging that Hancock cited a pretend learn about.

WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)?

A Stanford coach is accused of the use of an AI language type to jot down a professional declaration. (Getty Pictures)

“[The] Declaration of Prof. Jeff Hancock cites a study that does not exist,” attorneys argued in a contemporary 36-page memo. “No article by the title exists.”

The “study” used to be referred to as “The Influence of Deepfake Videos on Political Attitudes and Behavior” and used to be purportedly printed within the Magazine of Knowledge Generation & Politics. The Nov. 16 filing notes that the magazine is unique, however had by no means printed a learn about via that title.

“The publication exists, but the cited pages belong to unrelated articles,” the attorneys argued. “Most probably, the learn about used to be a ‘hallucination’ generated via an AI large language model like ChatGPT.”

“Plaintiffs do not know how this hallucination wound up in Hancock’s declaration, but it calls the entire document into question, especially when much of the commentary contains no methodology or analytic logic whatsoever.”

The file additionally screams out Ellison, arguing that “the conclusions that Ellison most relies on have no methodology behind them and consist entirely of expert say-so.”

“Hancock could have cited a real study similar to the proposition in paragraph 21,” the memo states. “But the existence of a fictional citation Hancock (or his assistants) didn’t even bother to click calls into question the quality and veracity of the entire declaration.”

BIDEN EXECUTIVE ORDER FOR ‘WOKE’ ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CALLED ‘SOCIAL CANCER’

Microsoft Bing Chat and ChatGPT AI chat packages are clear on a cellular instrument on this picture representation in Warsaw, Poland, on July 21, 2023.  (Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto by way of Getty Pictures)

The memorandum additionally doubles indisposed at the declare that the quotation is bogus, noting the a couple of searches attorneys went via to struggle to find the learn about.

“The title of the alleged article, and even a snippet of it, does not appear on anywhere on the internet as indexed by Google and Bing, the most commonly-used search engines,” the file states. “Searching Google Scholar, a specialized search engine for academic papers and patent publications, reveals no articles matching the description of the citation authored by ‘Hwang’ [the purported author] that includes the term ‘deepfake.’”

“Perhaps this was simply a copy-paste error? It’s not,” the submitting upcoming flatly states. “The article doesn’t exist.”

The lawyers concluded that, if the declaration have been partly fabricated, it’s completely unreliable and will have to be pushed aside from court docket attention.

“The declaration of Prof. Hancock should be excluded in its entirety because at least some of it is based on fabricated material likely generated by an AI model, which calls into question its conclusory assertions,” the file concluded. “The court may inquire into the source of the fabrication and additional action may be warranted.”

Minnesota Legal professional Common Keith Ellison arrives to talk on degree throughout the 3rd occasion of the Democratic Nationwide Conference on the United Heart on August 21, 2024, in Chicago, Illinois. (Getty Pictures)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Fox Information Virtual reached out to Ellison, Hancock and Stanford College for remark.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *